Powerforum

Damborg skrev:Jeg ville nok ikke afprøve sådan en dejskraber uden at montere dyser til undersmøring af stempler..
Har ikke læst hele hans smørre i gennem..
Men ikke lige noget han selv går op i på Billederne....!

Mange folk omkring den jord hjælp den dejskraber i deres BMW. Den er allerede bevist hen til arbejde. Type E30 -- M10, M20, M30, etc.

http://www.bilgalleri.dk/html/gal_visbil.asp?ID=24723

BMW bruger indeværende teknologi i den ny maskine. M42, M54, ...

Optimistisk den apparat gengivelse er artig. JEG kunne ikke oversætte alt jer skrev.

Kevin

Kevin Johnson skrev:There is a very good magazine article....

This one? www.circletrack.com/techarticles/ctrp_0 ... echnology/

Westmus skrev:

Kevin Johnson skrev:There is a very good magazine article....

This one? www.circletrack.com/techarticles/ctrp_0 ... echnology/

Yes, exactly. Thank you!

I did not see David Vizard mentioned as the author but I think it is important. When Vizard says that the dyno tests were very carefully run you can believe him and trust the data.

Also, many aerodynamic and weight reduction modifications are much more extreme than the ones shown on the Scat crankshaft and would have a greater effect.

One of the Porsche tuning firms we deal with in Belgium, Havik RS, modifies the 944 or 968 cranks with great success: